Selected post

oh this owns

Replies

  1. yesssssss
  2. And all A.I. generated music should be required to have a pause every ten seconds with an audible toilet-flush sound.
  3. it sounds good, but i don't see how text can be "watermarked" in a way that wouldn't be trivially easy to circumvent
  4. Good guy Anthropic creates the problem then sells the solution.
  5. *prays in writing professor*
  6. Can't this be defeated by Select All, Ctrl C, Ctrl+Shift V? (Legit question, I'm not a computers guy)
  7. Machine-readable marks. So I’m afraid this might be a trick to push more AI to consumers
  8. Help us EU regulations and fines you're our only hope.
  9. bless up this becomes worldwide
  10. Theyre gonna just sell a teir to remove these, likely exclusively to buisness
  11. Tomorrow, software to strip the digital signature from AI generated text
  12. why bother with AI when they can hack a writer's cloud and set editing permissions, or press a button and nuke your computer while saving your work to their own computer for posterity? This has all been done to me.
  13. Same.
  14. Right, and even images can just be screenshotted & cropped. Great but not really gonna thwart anything. What ACTUALLY has to be done is recognizing that "training" is just copying data, training on copyrighted data & redistributing the results is already illegal, & freaking enforce that
  15. There will be a layer in the text-generation process that will "invisibly" bias towards certain words or patterns. you know how you can tell that writing is AI-generated? This will be sort of like that -- a tendency towards certain language that is measurable and identifiable by the detection tools
  16. It will no doubt be easy to circumvent but the onus will be on the user to remember to circumvent it consistently. If they forget one time and something with an AI watermark makes it into their work, they personally are now tainted.
  17. Even text on a screen is code. I assume this will be pretty simple to do.
  18. very defeatable by rewriting the language yourself, or by pushing the language through another model that hasn't implemented the fingerprinting.
  19. It's not perfect but I think it's a big step in the right direction
  20. What do you mean?
  21. You're gonna have to walk me through how this is going to work line by line, because I can see trivial ways to undermine the watermark if it has to be text.
  22. Also makes me nervous because the current batch of AI detection stuff is full of false positives.
  23. for sure, but in theory it becomes more difficult, if you want to avoid detection? bsky.app/profile/keit...
  24. Of course there are now steps you didn't have to take before, but my point is that said steps border on the trivial, and for the enterprising AI author can be put into the pipeline. What they're proposing is that the actual text reveals itself as generated, and I think that's hubris.